Why?

Why the MyFace Biometric Sovereignty Standard exists

The case for a governance framework

Author: Toby Dupres Published: 2026 Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

What Is True

Your face is yours. It has always been yours. It is the most personal identifier you carry — permanent, unique, irreplaceable. Unlike a password, it cannot be changed outside of massive trauma or great expense. Unlike an account number, it cannot be reissued. It belongs to you by the simple fact of your existence, before any law was written, before any technology existed to dispute it.

This is not a political position. It is a statement of fact.

What Is Happening

Facial recognition technology is deployed at scale in retail environments, public spaces, consumer devices and social media platforms. The individuals whose faces are captured, processed and monetised by these systems have no knowledge this is occurring, no mechanism to prevent it, and no recourse when it does.

A governance gap exists. It is not hypothetical. It is measurable, documented and widening.

Commercial entities have operated within this gap under broad interpretations of existing privacy law. Self regulation has not closed it. Voluntary codes of conduct have not closed it. Financial penalties have been absorbed as a cost of doing business. The gap remains.

Biometric data is not ordinary personal data. Its permanent nature and unique link to physical identity place it in a category that existing frameworks have not adequately addressed. The consequences of inadequate governance are therefore not temporary or reversible. They are permanent.

This situation is not acceptable. It is also not inevitable.

What Must Happen

The MyFace Biometric Sovereignty Standard is a governance and transparency framework for biometric identity. It establishes the following principles as the minimum acceptable standard:

Every citizen is protected by default. No action should be required to protect what already belongs to you.

Commercial access to biometric data requires explicit, informed and revocable consent granted to specific registered entities for specific stated purposes. Permission is the exception. Protection is the rule.

Commercial entities must demonstrate legitimate value before they may request permission. The burden of proof lies with those who wish to process, not with those whose data would be processed.

Every verification request, every permission granted, every permission revoked is logged immutably and accessible to the citizen, the entity and the governance body. Transparency is not optional. It is structural.

Enforcement must be meaningful. Processing a protected biometric is a criminal matter, not a civil one. The era of fines absorbed as operational costs is over.

These principles are technically implementable now. The MyFace Biometric Sovereignty Standard provides the open standard, the API specification, and the governance framework to implement them. It is offered freely to any nation, institution or organisation that wishes to adopt it.

The technology exists. The framework exists. What remains is the decision to act.

My identity. My choice. My control.

© 2026 Toby Dupres. Published under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0).
You are free to share, adapt and build upon this material for any non-commercial purpose provided you credit Toby Dupres as the original author.
The MyFace Biometric Sovereignty Standard was originated by Toby Dupres and first published at biometricsovereigntystandard.org.uk in 2026. Attribution must be preserved in all derivative works.